Shreve is the kind of narrator I believe we all needed at this point of the story. He recounts the events of Miss Rosa, Thomas Sutpen, Henry, Judith, and Charles Bon- and Quentin’s involvement in the whole storyline- in much the same way I’ve been narrating it in my head. The entire timeline is a challenge to keep track of chronologically with each new piece of information either unfolded or put together through Quentin, his father’s, and Miss Rosa’s personal perspectives. A lot of events feel almost hard to comprehend in their own separate regard. Putting each piece together makes a bewildering story!
Shreve’s retelling reminds Quentin of his father’s style of storytelling and I think it’s in part of how unbiased he seems to be in his rehashing of events. Yes, his personal regards as to how incredulous the story is are felt through the narrative but ultimately he isn’t assigning roles to people the same way Miss Rosa had to Suptin (ogre/demon) or reimagining events as a moment in his own life like Quentin had with the reverie about Henry on the stairs as him and Addy. Shreve simply goes over these events as he’s heard them. Having such a removed place from the story gives us, the readers, a break from trying to figure out the facts of the history from the narrators influenced retellings.The way I imagined this story being put together is like reading a few reviews on a newly released movie, some saying the actor is terrible and some claiming it’s the actor’s best work. You won’t know the truth of the matter until you watch it for yourself but even then it cannot be considered “the truth of the matter” because it’s not only an opinion- your opinion as the viewer- but one that has been swayed one way or the other, if subconsciously. You go into the film with both perspectives and am made to pick a side- or come up with a new side that incorporates them. Shreve has taken everyone’s review, their side, and put them together forming his own view of the story (an amazed one).
As Faulkner manages to insert himself into his novels, here he’s given us a character to represent the outsider’s perspective including us (the readers) as the outsider. Faulkner nods to this when he says at the beginning of the chapter, where Shreve asks for clarification on his relation to Miss Rosa and Quentin recounts the questions people have asked, “[…] not Shreve’s first time, nobody’s first time in Cambridge since September: Tell about the South. […] Why do they live there. Why do they live at all.” Through Shreve and his questioning for clarifications (and Quentin’s more existential interpretation of these questions), we’re able to get a better understanding of the story that we wouldn’t have gotten otherwise. From all of the narrators we’ve had thus far, the story has yet to be called out plainly for what it is essentially- Southern gossip only being told because it would be against Southern manners for Quentin to tell Miss Rosa he has no interest in it as it has nothing to do with him. I don’t think it would be in any one narrator’s character to do so- except the non-American non-southern one.

